apiKeys: - myClientOne - myClientTwo. @jthomerson I don't think anyone has any issue with the "happy path". How about using the condition block of a resource to check if the resource exists? List the API key names in serverless.yml. Serverless does add a few variables, though: Additionally, some behaviour about usage plans and usage plan keys: You may be interested in creating your auth structure outside of any one api deployment and using CloudFormation's (via Serverless) Outputs service to get the ARN and/or ID of each of the resources you've created: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/outputs-section-structure.html. Start using Socket to analyze serverless-add-api-key-with-usage-plan and its 2 dependencies to secure your app from supply chain attacks. A better way is to grab the tablename via Ref where you need it and publish it through environment variables to your code. This means you use hosted services to augment your applicationsthink DynamoDB for data storage or Mailchimp for sending emails. Hello @Shereef - are you experiencing this one the latest version? I did a mistake to create a new DynamoDB table with wrong index, so I decided to delete the database and create again. Further, these hostnames will change if you remove and redeploy your service, which can cause problems for existing clients. cc @pmuens. This was never solved in a Framework, as it's very difficult to solve on CloudFormation level (read the above comment for more info). HTTP API aka API Gateway v2 did we just say something about confusing naming . I have a lambda service which subscribes to a SNS topic created, and written to, by a server resident service. I belive Serverless Framework doesn't use createChangeSet(), but instead calls updateStack() directly, so this would require a large refactoring. The question I have is "how did you ever get in the situation where the stack you're trying to deploy has the SQS queue defined in it, but that queue already exists?". Serverless applications are often service-fullapplications. https://forum.serverless.com/t/using-an-existing-api-key/770. However, (as per feedback / request from customers) there's the option to group different lambda functions under one service.name (by explicitly setting the same service.name for different functions). Building our first functions, here we will cover how to author our functions by setting up triggers, parse input either from route/query parameters or a posted Body. This is because external APIs require predictable and low latency response times. ***> wrote: -- Create a new JS file called private.js with some code like this one: Perfect , at the moment nothing fancy, but now lets secure our EndPoint, In the serveless.yml file we will add the following magic lines. It may require tons of work (and new issues to fight with), as already observed by @kennu. README. Sign in Because the premise that I'm operating on is: No other stack should define the same resource, so if I have that resource deployed from its original stack, how could I have another stack that "crashes" when I try to deploy it? I would be happy for this feature to exists as well. How does DNS work when it comes to addresses after slash? ***> wrote: You signed in with another tab or window. The AWS::ApiGateway::ApiKey resource creates a unique key that you can distribute to clients who are executing API Gateway Method resources that require an API key. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Sign in Also works with multiple keys. It is (probably most) often a service to a larger application. I agree with @rowanu here. iron maiden tour 2022 denver; dangerous android apps; nordictrack adjustable dumbbells manual; multiversus launch options steam; gray cowl of nocturnal skyrim id; Why bad motor mounts cause the car to shake and vibrate at idle but not when you give it gas and increase the rpms? And then my lambda that connects to the User Dynamo DB table is created on a separate stack? Site design / logo 2022 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Position where neither player can force an *exact* outcome. In AWS SDK it's implemented with the ResourcesToImport parameter to createChangeSet. This is inconsistent, at best. This plugin associates your Serverless service with same api key if the key already exists. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: If the data is too important to delete, you probably shouldn't be managing the Table resource in your service definition - it belongs outside, either in a "resource-only service" (if you want to use sls to manage it), or in a completely different CFN template. ------------------------------------------------------------ Given Serverless is a private company Do you guys have any open governance structure for the framework? Not sure why that's a constraint between different stages. Erroneous handling of pre-existing event resources. I'll keep this post updated with all errors that I found to convince you that it should be implemented. The best workaround in my opinion is separating your core services that should be retained into a separate Framework service and referencing these in your services that can be fully removed. You signed in with another tab or window. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/43771000/how-to-migrate-dynamodb-data-on-major-table-change/43790256#43790256, Resource DynamoDb Error on deploy in another region, https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAD73HN7ALBT565HUI6JEDRP5Z2HANCNFSM4C6UDZTA, http://fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu/staff/wohlgemuth, https://www.linkedin.com/in/berlinguyinca, https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAD73EP24G6VRY3XHE3QW3RP6F27ANCNFSM4C6UDZTA, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/resource-import-existing-stack.html, can not run deployment if dynamodb already exists, https://www.serverless.com/framework/docs/guides/compose. Delete the offending API mapping and all should work for you. The plugin by default displays the created key and value on the console. With Serverless, it's easier than ever to deploy production-ready API endpoints. Ah, what you need is SkipIfExists: True in your yml file. But now I got another problem: Same with SQS queues, it should be possible to just print a warning and not Why wont my SQLAlchemy frontend connect to my PostgreSQL backend? One of my projects was set up with Cognito in early 2017. And the error becomes again, DynamoDBTable already exists. On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 7:21 PM Jeremy Thomerson ***@***. Specifies whether the key identifier is distinct from the created API key value. This case is not like I am trying to upload a new project with resources already deployed. thanks, Having a similar issue with the ApiGatewayApiKey1 - API Key already exists. Sign in What's the best way to roleplay a Beholder shooting with its many rays at a Major Image illusion? to your account. serta iseries hybrid 300 plush . You can have the table and function in the same stack. During testing of the same issue I noticed the API Key ID generated was identical based on the API Key Value, and in conjunction with the documentation of the CloudFormation resource+property AWS::ApiGateway::ApiKey - GenerateDistinctId shows that the GenerateDistinctId field was deprecated but states: Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Is it possible for a gas fired boiler to consume more energy when heating intermitently versus having heating at all times? to your account. (Obs: I use retain in config). The structure is roughly as follows, with explanations below: Each of these Resources are named after the key you give them. It prevents continuous deployment on my system. Why are standard frequentist hypotheses so uninteresting? I'm still not seeing a solution here for defining a pre-existing, possibly shared, resource as a trigger for a lambda, in ServerLess. If a bucket already >exists, it should not complain. In the serverless.yml file you can specify the name of an API key to use with functions in the deployed API. Where custom.config.apiKeyId is an API Key ID you've configured that already exists. While creating AWS Serverless API gateway using SAM this configuration to deploy to the 'Prod' Stage along with serverless code sample, but while creating resources it create two stage under API gateway one which you provided as per below example and one is default Stage. than all integration tests are run and so on. Deploy on another stage fails when api key is present. I am constantly running in this issue aswell. It generates the key even if one with the same name already exists in the environment. Let's create it by using the aws-sam-cli. Already on GitHub? Not the answer you're looking for? Once we log in to our AWS account we can navigate to API Gateway in order to inspect or manually configure different APIs. What is the use of NTP server when devices have accurate time? This will allow you to change the usage plans independent of the apis themselves and maintain that separately. Sometimes you need that the access to your API will be private maybe all your API or maybe some particular EndPoints. P.S. I had a bug that cloudformation just stuck at UPDATE_ROLLBACK_FAILED. Test again the secured EndPoint without using the token, Its time to test our API Key to access our private EndPoint. To declare this entity in your AWS CloudFormation template, use the following syntax: Can you give an example? In this case ServerLess should skip the creation of the pre-existent resource. I think the same question basically applies to @bwship's description of his scenario. Ah, what you need is SkipIfExists: True in your yml file. By November 4, 2022 No Comments 1 Min Read. Its related to bugs like that: #3146 With API Keys we can secure all our API or some EndPoints and using the Serverless Framework to configuring in a pretty straight forward way. Execute any query, for example, SELECT 1, on serverless SQL pool to activate it and make the databases appear. This plugin associates your Serverless service with same api key if the key already exists. As I said, a bug anywhere could happen, as it did for me. Try Serverless Console Monitor, observe, and trace your serverless architectures. Nevertheless it should be solved in SLS so that name clashes are prevented at the root. What do you suggest as the best way to resolve those issues that block serverless? I'm going to close it, please read carefully the reasoning: What we deal with here, is not a limitation of a Framework per se, but limitation of CloudFormation through which Framework deploys configured services. A different key value and my problems go away. The Serverless usagePlan plugin object would need changed around here: serverless/lib/plugins/aws/package/compile/events/api-gateway/lib/usage-plan.js. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Serverless gives you the name of the serverless-generated Resource names in case you wish to overwrite parts of them or reference them. @pmuens When you agree with putting your databases into another stack. The plugin by default displays the created key and value on the console. Thus, managing dynamodb externally tasks like the suggestion to go back to a hosted solution. Accepting this because it looks very useful (thank you! I already have a small project running with sls 0.5.6 and now I decided to create a big one under serverless framework. different stage names each time, or modifying the service name between builds), or you're maybe deleting the stack between builds? While I agree CloudFormation should handle the resource existence related issues, I'd like there to be a functionality in serverless where I can easily pass a flag for skipping specific resources so it would not be included in the CF template to begin with. creates a api key and usage pattern (if they don't already exist) and associates them to the Rest Api. 504), Mobile app infrastructure being decommissioned, Using an existing API keys(multiple keys) with the Serverless Framework in AWS, "UNPROTECTED PRIVATE KEY FILE!" By November 4, 2022 ga dot physical requirements. Each time you deploy, so long as you didn't change the table definition, the table won't change. If your service deployment then fails, the DB and other critical resources won't be affected when your service CF stack needs to be removed. Also works with multiple keys. I agree with the point that you might want to put this kind of resources into separate stacks and manage them there. Maybe, as a guess, this is because it's better from a security standpoint to not re-use API Key values unless you mean to, so AWS is forcing the issue to ensure compliance that API key values are explicitly tracked from a single resource to avoid reusing values between APIs without realizing it. Why does sending via a UdpClient cause subsequent receiving to fail? with Serverless Compose functionality: https://www.serverless.com/framework/docs/guides/compose. The plugin by default displays the created key and value on the console. Serverless plugin for managing custom domains with API Gateways. However, when the resource is a SNS Topic, that is not the case. View on Github serverless-domain-manager Create custom domain names that your lambda can deploy to with serverless. Then I manually deleted the table, triggered the deployment, the serverless created it, but the same error next deployment. Love podcasts or audiobooks? You can use PostMan, or curl to query your api with the x-api-key header. Space - falling faster than light? I dont know if it is applicable to every "resources", atleast for databases I think. @hermanmedsleuth then why is my serverless.yml file an interface to CF and not just a subset of it? Key is that data can be accessed without the need to copy data into SQL tables. Serverless should skip creating keys if they exist. P.S. But, I would love for it to be an explicit option rather than a default. sam init --runtime python3.7 -n basic-aws-apigateway . This is a very core need. If an event can reference a pre-existing resource, then ServerLess should not gork if it cannot create it. Have a question about this project? Due to implied complexity this doesn't seem as right direction. But that's not strictly necessary. Version: 3.4.0 was published by nhancers. but AFAIK you can't use variables in keys. Deploy on another stage fails when api key is present, AWS::ApiGateway::ApiKey - GenerateDistinctId. I define a stack with this resource (database table, SQS queue, S3 bucket, etc), I should never delete that stack unless I no longer have a need for that resource. privacy statement. @bwship yes, you can do it that way. Thanks for reporting @shatgupt and thanks for jumping in @HyperBrain. Allows for base path mapping when deploying and deletion of domain names. Feel free to re-open if this is still a problem. I would like the same feature to add my Cognito User Pools to CloudFormation @felschr. This is just a bit counter intuit. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. API key example. Well occasionally send you account related emails. When the migration is complete, you will access your Teams at stackoverflowteams.com, and they will no longer appear in the left sidebar on stackoverflow.com. I can deploy a thousand times and never hit an issue. So If my serverless consists of dynamodb only that doesn't change this fact. This includes adding in a custom usage plan with specific api keys enabled: https://serverless.com/framework/docs/providers/aws/guide/resources/. In its context we attach to eventually already existing resources on deploy, as it's being requested here. While what's being requested seems now "kind of" possible with CloudFormation (via combination of handling of DeletionPolicy and introduced not far ago import resources capability). When I tried to deploy the same api with stage prod, it failed with error: Serverless should skip creating keys if they exist. This is usually the case when a function requires a parameter such as an API key, which is stored and available in one environment, but is then deployed into another environment which does not contain the key in its parameter store. In my mind, they would be part of one stack, and the IAC code would create the dynamo table, then deploy the lambda, then connect the dynamo table to the lambda. But I think bug still applies if I want to have same keys. Closing since this issue is quite old and there's a potential workaround in the thread. Serverless framework AWS cross-account custom authorizer, Serverless framework is not deploying an API Gateway on AWS from configuration, Serverless deploy doesn't integrate AWS Lambda with SQS event, Serverless framework for AWS : Adding initial data into Dynamodb table, Multiple url path option error using graphql, aws lambda and serverless framework, Serverless: create api key from SecretsManager value. Teleportation without loss of consciousness. But then there are outliers like @jasonmccallister s case, or for instance my own where I added unrelated line and got an error regarding dynamodb. Also works with multiple keys. I deployed a service + dynamodb table via serverless successfully without error, but when I redeploy it again I got this error. Could we just have a simple plugin maybe? Return Values Ref. It had no major release in the last 12 months. serverless plugin to create a api key and usage pattern (if they don't already exist) and associates them to the Rest Api. The plugin supports serverless stages, so you can create key (s) with different name in different stage. This plugin associates your Serverless service with same api key if the key already exists. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. @kennu has made a plugin for deploying additional CF stacks with Serverless. We like to share key values between stages and that should be allowed! Shouldn't the community try to find a collective solution to this? Name for phenomenon in which attempting to solve a problem locally can seemingly fail because they absorb the problem from elsewhere?